Before I do PvP, and yes it is coming, I thought I'd share this little lovely example of Mookie creepiness that someone sent into me.
"Her blood is slowly turning to ice, and soon it will freeze her heart. She's going to die a slow, cold death."
However, that will not stop Terracciano from slaving away drawing a Goddamn panty-shot of her. I mean, glossing over his inability to draw anything attractive (male, female, vegetable, mineral) that's some creepy shit right there. His equally-creepy fans are out there, creepily staring at the badly-proportioned ass of a dying woman. And jackin' it. Jackin' it like never before.
Anyone who had any doubts about the rape thing, he's off showing an unconscious woman as a sex object. Worse, a dying and unconscious girl. He's sexualising someone who literally cannot say no, or fight back, or resist in any way. Go ahead and tell me I'm reading too much into this (I know you will, Bobby Howard!) but that's how it is. This isn't some clumsy, shitty storyline where Terracciano gets on his stubby soapbox and tries to pretend his storebought opinions are worth listening to. This is a guy drawing upskirt ass shots of an unconscious girl because it gets him off.
Tune in next year when Dominic Deegan: Oracle for Hire will have the titular character jamming his multiple demon cocks into the corpses of all the girls who ever turned Terracciano down for a date as his ongoing descent into mysoginistic madness reaches a climatic orgasm of insanity and the webcomic ends when he's locked away for being too fucking creepy. Because, seriously, I know I used a metaphor on him where I called him a paedophile, but this is verging into actual sex offender territory.
Okay, next up is PvP for real, I swear. I just had to mention this first.
"Her blood is slowly turning to ice, and soon it will freeze her heart. She's going to die a slow, cold death."
However, that will not stop Terracciano from slaving away drawing a Goddamn panty-shot of her. I mean, glossing over his inability to draw anything attractive (male, female, vegetable, mineral) that's some creepy shit right there. His equally-creepy fans are out there, creepily staring at the badly-proportioned ass of a dying woman. And jackin' it. Jackin' it like never before.
Anyone who had any doubts about the rape thing, he's off showing an unconscious woman as a sex object. Worse, a dying and unconscious girl. He's sexualising someone who literally cannot say no, or fight back, or resist in any way. Go ahead and tell me I'm reading too much into this (I know you will, Bobby Howard!) but that's how it is. This isn't some clumsy, shitty storyline where Terracciano gets on his stubby soapbox and tries to pretend his storebought opinions are worth listening to. This is a guy drawing upskirt ass shots of an unconscious girl because it gets him off.
Tune in next year when Dominic Deegan: Oracle for Hire will have the titular character jamming his multiple demon cocks into the corpses of all the girls who ever turned Terracciano down for a date as his ongoing descent into mysoginistic madness reaches a climatic orgasm of insanity and the webcomic ends when he's locked away for being too fucking creepy. Because, seriously, I know I used a metaphor on him where I called him a paedophile, but this is verging into actual sex offender territory.
Okay, next up is PvP for real, I swear. I just had to mention this first.
96 comments:
- Why on earth are you spending so much time on Domonic Deegan (or any at all)? Do you have some personal beef with the guy? I mean, shooting fish in a barel is too kind a metaphor for how easy it is to make fun of this comic, and it's not as if there's a shortage of poorly drawn, poorly written, and more popular webocomics scraping along out there in cyber space. So why this one, particular easy target? Have you not yet realized you've spent nearly 5 paragraphs on the art alone? I'm just saying, if you're really out there to be an asshole, you might reconsider you're approach. Not that I don't doubt you just want to see how many poorly structured profanity laden pages it takes to make a population of reclusive self made artists cry, and I'm sure it's fun typing line after line of mix and match profanity just for the sake of it. I just kind of feel bad for you.
- While Dominic Deegan remains appallingly terrible, this update was pointless. Plus, I don't think that "panty shot" was necessarily gratuitous, so this particular criticism of the guy comes off - bizarrely - as baseless.
- Fuck ya both. After today's strip I'd cheated not to have an update.
- And THAT is why you should look to places other than superhero comics for inspiration. There are a lot of shitty one that pull this same crap. Only with Mookie it's worse because he has less sense of anatomy than rob layfeild.
- Weeeeell, the thing is that 'Mookie' has made absolutely no effort to improve and continually draws poorly-proportioned ass shots and the like for even the flimsiest of excuses. Judging by the Foglio-Abrams Horrible Creepy Misogynist Index, I'd say he is one creepy motherfucker.
- "Plus, I don't think that "panty shot" was necessarily gratuitous" So it was a panty shot for plot sake? Character development? Maybe I'm just not obsessed with anime and manga enough, but I can't ever see a good reason for a panty shot. I can't imagine drawing an action scene, then saying to myself "You know what would make this scene have even more serious impact? Pussy."
- You Americans creep me out
- Aesir, have a link to that index? I'm of the mind that one can never rag on Dominic Deegan enough. It's the most popular crappy comic out there. Others are more popular but better, and others are crappier but don't have such a large following. Deegan is the perfect storm of bad webcomics. Fire at will.
- The thing I find most hilarious is the fact that this is like the third of fourth time you've talked about this comic, but you are still apparently avidly reading it so you can talk about it some more. You are actually a fan.
- I think you're reading a liiitle too much into this, John. Anyway, if you want to see ridiculous. Look at today's DD comic. LOOK AT IT. Words cannot describe it.
- I don't quite get this one. How can it be an upskirt or a pantie shot when she's wearing neither a skirt nor panties? That's her pants...
- cat herder: Are you illiterate? He said that someone emailed him informing him of the panty-shot, not that he'd seen it himself. Man, that's some gross shit.
- "Plus, I don't think that "panty shot" was necessarily gratuitous" This is simultaneously the funniest and yet most pathetic sentence ever written in English.
- Also, I enjoy making fun of Dominic Deegan because it's a terrible webcomic that has a lot of highly-strung fans who whine and cry the moment someone talks shit about their beloved Terracciano or his glorious magnum opus. Also because I get people insisting on retarded shit like non-gratuitous pantyshots. It's COMEDY GOLD.
- I too am interested in the 'Foglio-Abrams Horrible Creepy Misogynist Index'. Because, quite frankly, I have no idea who this Abrams you're referring to is and all I know about Phil Foglio is that he has a comic called Girl Genius which a lot of people love and I've never bothered to read.
- Last time I checked, a panty shot actually involved seeing panties.
- John I still have no idea where the fuck you're pulling all these "highly-strung fans who whine and cry" from. The title of the thread about today's comic (in the Keenspot forum) is "You have got to be fucking kidding me".
- I'm assuming that the panty shot was him copying some hentai or moe shit that was lying around, since he probably couldn't manage that angle on his own. It's still pretty messed-up looking, what with being out of perspective and scale. And the fact that out of ALL THE ANGLES that he could've used, he went straight for twat central.
- Look, dumbass, she's just lying there. I wouldn't even have noticed the position if you hadn't pointed it out. You can't even see much. Hence why I felt the need to put "panty shot" in quotation marks.
- Wow, it wasn't that long ago that I said the DD wasn't as bad as you made it out to be, but the comic for 7/18/07 was lamer than the rock concert storyline; an event hitherto believed impossible by modern science. I've been reading because I've been hoping they'll cut back to Karnak eventually. I like him except for the fact that Terracciano randomly changed him from being one of the good guys who had gone crazy from being dragged into Hell, to someone who apparently deserved it for trying to kill Dominic's dad. Also, I totally didn't notice her bottom hanging out until you drew attention to it. That makes you a Bad Man.
- "Look, dumbass, she's just lying there. I wouldn't even have noticed the position if you hadn't pointed it out." Look, officer, I wouldn't have even noticed she's underage if you hadn't pointed it out. I mean that's why-- wait, where are you taking me?
- For some reason, "SuperGreg" creeps me out even more than the dying woman-ass. It's like we've gone beyond Mook's original craziness and now he's writing out his fucking childhood superhero fantasies, complete with a cape.
- I don't care for Dominic Deegan one way or another. I just like reading how John Solomon's mind is so easily challenged. Gasp! No! The internet?! I got a new title for ya. See what you think... 'John's opinions are weak and no one cares' Catchy.
- Are you trying to be funny? I kind of missed that if you are. Mostly you just seem really angry, which sort of confuses me.
- Whats really funny about John Salolame planning on doing a PVP review is that Scott Kurtz did a podcast over at Half Pixel not too long ago about how people who read comics religiously with the intent to tear them down are just as much fans as the supposed fan boys. The first step to getting help is admitting you have a problem. So c'mon Johnny, which of the of the fetishes and other such nonesense you scream about in these lame ass essays do you secretly take part in?
- greymatter, you do know that you can hate something and rant about it, without secretly loving it, right? Here is a thought, and it might be too simple, and I don't have quotes from over rated web comic makers or anything but still, it might be right. Maybe these web comics just suck. Man, now if only Scott Kurtz had said that in a pod cast, I could use it as fact.
- And we've reached the trifecta of "utterly retarded excuses why people cannot simply dislike something": 1. You don't draw/write/direct/act/sing so how do you know anything?! 2. You're just jealous of whatever it is you dislike!! 3. You're secretly approving of it otherwise you wouldn't be talking about it!! For a brief explanation of how none of these lines work, how about some real-world examples: "Try this broccoli." "I hate broccoli." 1. "Do you grow your own broccoli? Because if you don't then you're not qualified to dislike it." 2. "You're just jealous you're not a broccoli farmer." 3. "You have to love it if you're taking the time to say how much you hate it!" Seriously, nothing any of you morons say to try and get me to stop poking fun at your favourite shitty webcomics is going to get me to actually stop.
- Eh, that's actually pretty innocuous compared to the ferretballesque "Rape Is Sometimes Justified" thing. I mean come on, write a paragraph every time mookie does anything even slightly dumb or creepy and you're gonna be stuck here all year.
- "1. You don't draw/write/direct/act/sing so how do you know anything?!" This is probably my second most-hated thing in the world, ever.
- I wouldn't mess with PVP Johnny. Kurtz would actually defend himself...
- Since you're trying to position yourself as the master of all webcomics Johnny why don't you put pen to paper and create one ? Obviously, yours wouldn't suck...
- Dude. The problem is that you keep eating the broccoli.
- No, I keep telling people how bad it is. Yes, sometimes I look through webcomic archives when writing up a review, but otherwise I don't touch them. Things like this, or when JDR directed his crazy at me, I don't go looking for. Other people find it and pass it on. I'm just happy talking shit about really bad webcomics. Oh, and to the person who said: "Since you're trying to position yourself as the master of all webcomics Johnny why don't you put pen to paper and create one ? Obviously, yours wouldn't suck..." CAN YOU NOT READ ARE YOU FUCKING BLIND This is "You don't draw/write/direct/act/sing so how do you know anything?!" and I just pointed out why it's fucking retarded and... oh, forget it, I'm this close to switching on the comment moderation.
- He can dish it out but he sure can't take it
- You know, I really hate Dane Cook. His jokes aren't funny at all, despite everyone who laughs at his stupid "Hey, remember the 80s?" routine. Maybe I should become a stand-up comedian, because I obviously wouldn't suck. My point: you don't need to be proctologist to recognize when something's shitty.
- "Dude. The problem is that you keep eating the broccoli." How about this as a better metaphor. ----------------------------- "Hey, you've got to try THIS broccoli! Everyone likes it, it's got amazing flavor and the creator is a genius!" "I hate broccoli." "Why? This broccoli is fantastic!" "I just hate it, OK? It's disgusting and it's everywhere, I can't beleive people like it." "But this is NEW broccoli! You haven't even tried it, why don't you try it before you say you hate it? It's totally not the same as all the rest of the bad broccoli out there!" *tries some* "Oh god, that's nasty! Jesus, how can you LIKE that?" "What was wrong with it?" *writes up a big review describing how it's limp, has shitty texture, is strangely colored, comes in ridiculous packaging, smells like ass, and tastes like it's been run over four times by the produce truck* "You just don't understand this broccoli. You think you could grow some better broccoli? You think that you could produce superior foliage?" -- TWO WEEKS LATER -- "Hey, I know you said you hate broccoli, but there's this new broccoli out that's pretty great. Everyone says nothing but great stuff about it, you should try some! It's definitely better than that old broccoli!" Repeat until a blog forums :)
- First time typing here, and I enjoy the site. I roll my eyes at these webcomics and think your reviews are very entertaining. I'm not sure what everyone is so upset about. Just sit back and enjoy comical reviews about stupid webcomics. There are rarely any web comics I like, as I feel they go hand in hand with fanfics, which I can't stand due to exposing myself to the worst ever for comedy reasons. Basically the internet has given the most talentless people a chance to pretend they're creative geniuses. I find your reviews to be pretty valid. Your Shortpacked, review for example was spot on. I loved the funny bits but then groaned in agony when it would get dramatic. And this Dominic Deegan crap, which I've never seen til now is just abominable. So what other people say on here.... eh... you give me a smile at least, so cool.
- I have to agree with everyone saying that this panty shot was pretty tame. But then I masturbate to tentacle rape hentai and fetish cosplay porn on a daily basis. So I assume that those I'm agreeing with do the same.
- He can dish it out but he sure can't take it I can take it, sure, but it's boring to have people continually using the same "WELL WHY DON'T YOU MAKE A WEBCOMIC TOUGH GUY" line on me all the time. Or the "you're just jealous" shit. Or trying to pretend how little they care about my blog by following it religiously and posting comments ten times a day. These comments are only fun when people are trying to be smart and failing, parroting the same shit all the time is monotonous and makes the comments read like Sluggy Freelance or some shit.
- I ADMIT EVERYONE MY COMIC IS BAD I AM THE WORST COMIC ARTIST EVER JOHN SOLOMON YOU ARE THE WIZARD GENIUS OF THE INTERNET I AM GOING TO GO ROLL IN MY OWN FECES AS PUNISHMENT FOR THE HORRORS I HAVE COMMITTED VIA MY WEBCOMIC
- Well it's about time.
- I can't really tell how much you've responded to my coments. No pressure, I'm sure you've got a busy and fulfilling life and I've no reason to infer you're shying away from engaging in dialogue. I am still currious, however, as to wheter there's some point to this burried deep beneath out pooring of rage. Of course, if you just enjoy seeing your name followed by the word "shit", I've no reason to tell you that you can't. Personally I don't understand why you would want to start a blog dedicated to being angry and trying to make people angry at you, and you're writing is pathetic, but y'know, whatever gets you off. I don't really understand the being angry in the first place, but I suppose just because I'm not intensely indignant that someone would dare write something not geared towards my personal enjoyment doesn't mean that noone else can be, and I realize you don't care what people think to the point of reading their message boards to see what they're saying about you, but if you care to share you're opinion beyond labeling what's fucked up, the oppurtunity is there. Feel free to enlighten me.
- Cephalopod9, writing bad reviews is fun.
- Y'know, all the hatemail here just shows that webcomics artists just can't take criticism. The barbs wouldn't sting if they weren't true. Sure, Mr. Solomon's a bit harsh, but that's what you need to be in order to get the artist's attention when they're surrounded by sycophantic fanboys. You don't learn anything about your own work if you only hear reactions from people who love it.
- Out of curiosity, are there any webcomics out there you like or just won't do on here. As far as I can tell, you could write a review ripping the piss out of every comic ever created for one reason or another. If there're no exceptions, then we're probably going to be here for a long time... That said, I do actually enjoy the reviews, though might not agree with the sentiments. Rage and invective on your level is always at least mildly entertaining.
- Many people have made a living at being angry. Look at George Carlin or Denis Leary. It's a good and honest comedic living being angry.
- "I AM GOING TO GO ROLL IN MY OWN FECES AS PUNISHMENT FOR THE HORRORS I HAVE COMMITTED VIA MY WEBCOMIC" And there's your fatal mistake: the real Scott Kurtz wouldn't call that a punishment.
- "and you're writing is pathetic" You sure showed him.
- "Basically the internet has given the most talentless people a chance to pretend they're creative geniuses." Brilliant. So many webcomic creators think that taking the time to make a webcomic is the same thing as making a webcomic good. Every art requires discipline and criticism in order to improve, but when you can just post whatever you want without any sort of editing or screening, you're just showing off how lazy you truly are.
- WEBCOMICS ARE SERIOUS I AM DONE WITH THEM THEY'RE TOO SERIOUS FOR ME
- scott kurtz made fred gallagher cry and that makes him ok in my book
- Scott Kurtz also can't stop spewing irrelevant shit at every given turn. Hey Kurtz, wanna explain to me just what the hell you're trying to convey as Francis' action in the last panel here: http://www.pvponline.com/article/3432/tue-jul-17?y=
- THAT IS A TYPO I MEANT TO PUT A QUESTION MARK IT WAS NOOOOOOO? LOOK AT HIS EXPRESSION AND HIS ARMS, IT IS IMPLICIT
- "scott kurtz made fred gallagher cry" What? If this is true then i need to send Kurtz a gift basket or something.
- Rodney Caston had a kid or something and Kurtz made note of the fact, and in his post he also noted that Fred who was too busy fellating his weeaboo fans to say something. Fred made a huge whiny "rant" in rebuttal and Kurtz apologised to all of fred's fans and told them to go back to watching inuyasha and eating pockey and choking on on fred's dick. Kurtz made a total win there.
- I JUST MADE A TOTAL WIN IN MY PANTS
- Conway, I think the comic there is supposed to be a Star Wars joke. Because that's certainly topical. And the Gallagher/Kurtz thing was essentially Kurzt congratulating Rodney Caston on the birth of his kid and saying something like "That's at least something Fred can't steal from you", which would be mighty scathing except for the part where Rodney got a cash payout and all. Gallagher complained a lot in response, because apparently everyone hates him for what he did or some shit. In conclusion, they're both dicks, but for different reasons.
- FRED GALLAGHER IS THE NAME OF GOD ON THE LIPS OF CHILDREN EVERYWHERE
- I know what the joke is supposed to be, the human deep fryer has only done that same gag roughly two hundred times before. What I meant is, that Francis' pose in the last panel looks like he's raising the fucking roof instead of shouting in agony/disappointment/hunger. Who the hell throws their hands up in that position when shouting. I also enjoy the anatomy in the last panel here: http://www.pvponline.com/article/3435/thu-jul-19?y= Man, polio sure is a terrible thing to have. As long as I'm linking this festering shit here, I might as well bring this up http://www.pvponline.com/article/3436/fri-jul-20?y= Now Kurtz, who claims to not "get" Achewood or simply not like it, I forget which one, pretty blatantly steals the dogbulance gag from Achewoods rabbit ambulance strip. Hell, it's even on a t-shirt over there: http://www.achewood.com/shop/app_dmain_bny.php Now, I know Kurtz is no stranger to intellectual theft, but dumbo drop didn't even bother to redraw the picture of the ambulance he's used a punchline at least twice before. Instead he went about it as he usually does, by scribbling over his existing template and slightly modifying it. For shame Kurtz!
- I like how cephalopod9 said "you're writing is pathetic" just... just saying
- I think we all know that John Solomon is actually the original author of Space Moose. Which, combined with his efforts here, officially qualifies him for Sainthood. Pope Benedict, the ball is in your court.
- Again with all of the Anonymous posts! Why are people so afraid of the repercussions of voicing their opinion on a shitty webcomic?
- It's so cute how people think that since you hate DD, you love it. I assume they're going off the idea that when you're a kid and your mum tells you that the mean boy who shoves you in the dirt does it cause it he secretly loves you. It was a lie, he just really hated you. That's all that's going on here, pure, unadultered, entertaining hate.
- panty shot or not nothing good has ever happened to a dd female character that is all you have to know
- I think Johnny has writer's block...
- This blog needs more naked chicks. Update already.
- I like your terse comments on the webcomics, albeit filled a little too much with expletives. It may just bring your analysis down slightly. If you skip the blatant swearing, getting down to the truth of the webcomics, I think your opinion would be even stronger.
- When handles don't mean much, does it matter if we're anonymous?
- A point can be just as valid with or without swear words. What the swear words do, though, is add feeling. Which carries more punch to it, "I hate this comic" or "I hate this shitty comic"? Also: fuck you, man.
- Matt, what? What the hell? How would removing words add MORE to an argument? Not only are cursewords used in addition to a sentence or phrase, but they add an attitude and connotation to a work. There's a difference between respecting an argument less because you are offended by cursing than an argument being lessened because there is cursing. Namely, only the former is true.
- Oh dear lord, after PvP you should see http://www.chivalryandknavery.com/ What boggles my mind is that even though it's so unbelievably awful, the guy actually constantly runs ads for it. It's like yelling "look at my seeping growth on my crotch!"
- Blah blah blah, these webcomics suck, blah blah blah, people who like them suck, blah blah blah, everybody who is not me sucks. Fuck shit damn. Wait, I just summarized your entire blog. Sorry, mate.
- While swearing may add to the whole, when it is used more frequently than punctuation it tends to decrease its overall value. That is, "fuck" used five times can be more effective than "fuck" used twentyfive times.
- Hahah, Eddy's got it. Truly John will never recover from that scathing insult! By the by, how are you enjoying the latest Deegan story arc?
- "How would removing words add MORE to an argument?" To paraphrase some quote that I can't be bothered to look up: Something is perfect not when there is nothing else to add, but when there is nothing else to take away.
- Ben wrote - I can't imagine drawing an action scene, then saying to myself "You know what would make this scene have even more serious impact? Pussy." Basically, yes. If you really need to draw somebody lying on the ground dying and you want it to have some dramatic impact, maybe try to shy away from lovingly delineating her pudenda?
- Update faster, goddammit.
- Fuck you, buddy, I ain't got no schedule for this shit.
- "Again with all of the Anonymous posts! Why are people so afraid of the repercussions of voicing their opinion on a shitty webcomic?" Maybe because we don't have anything to log in as.
- Lazy cock, registration is free.
- "Maybe because we don't have anything to log in as." You can choose to leave your name without registering, dipshit.
- "Plus, I don't think that "panty shot" was necessarily gratuitous, so this particular criticism of the guy comes off - bizarrely - as baseless." ... Just answer this one question: In what universe is a panty-shot not gratuitous? Okay, onto the review before I decide to compete with John. Honestly, I think someone could, using every Deagan comic, manage to write four years worth of blogs on just how bad it is. And, considering the amount of it I read before I closed the window and wept for the last remnants of my hope for humanity dying, I can see why you focus on it. Seriously, I'd offer to help you beat the guy with the clue bat, except some part of me is scared that whatever makes him draw that webcomic is infectious and I seriously don't want to catch it. Oh, if you want another one to review: http://triumphantlosers.comicgenesis.com/
- Solomon, if you're looking for webcomics misogynists to skewer, there's a much more appropriate target than Deegan: Least I Could Do. Whereas I could conceivably chalk Mookie's apparent misogyny up to cluelessness and poor writing skills, the guy who writes Least I Could Do seems to know what he's doing. His Mary Sue self-insertion character (whose name is even a play on the author's) is all the more pathetic when you realize it represents the author's ambition is to be a complete asshole. It's written a lot better than Deegan, and it's even funny on occasion, but it's fucked up, and deserves a good verbal ass-whipping.
- Kindof hard to draw a panty shot that isn't gratuitous. She could have been lying on the ground with her ass facing away from the camera. He chose to draw her that way.
- For the record, I think John Solomon is pretty jealous that he's not a fucking broccoli farmer.
- Least I Could Do is well-drawn, well-written, and one of the nastiest little piles of poop on the whole of the Internets. We're not only supposed to feel affection for the self-absorbed piece-of-shit main character, we're supposed to find his loathsome behavior admirable. Well, screw that. Let me know if one of Rayne's hate-fucks ever goes Lorena Bobbit on his ass, because that's about the only thing could get me to read this rancid beer fart of a strip again.
- For the record, I think John Solomon is pretty jealous that he's not a fucking broccoli farmer. Those bastards get all the girls, them and their all-natural produce!
- I did not "dream" of writing for Family Guy, due to the punchline of Comic 100(which was a JAB at Family Guy). And also, you claimed that the Loco-Roco comic is a stolen joke. Anyone have anything to back that up, because I don't recall seeing or hearing that one anywhere else. I stole a joke from my sister once, it was the "I think Bernie Mac plays Bosley in Transformers" line. But that's a different comic. Can anyone fill me in on what he means by "stolen jokes"? Silly Solomon...
- You can't even post a comment to the right entry, hahaha.
- Solomon, you're right on. Too fucking creepy, porn of dead/unconscious women should be relegated to horror movies/weird people. And yet DD is very popular! But wait: 99.95% of Japanese cartoons have the exact same problem. Hmmmm, maybe I've come upon your master plan....you are trolling all the most popular webcomics in a flamboyant manner in order to spread this truth. I can only salute you. --Charles Frederick
- It's not trolling, but thank you, possibly?
- Hey, John Solomon. I just want to say I support you, man. In my youth I sat through hours upon hours of anime & derivative shit like Deegan where they threw in bouncing boobs or panty shots into tragic scenes. I just want to say I think it's awesome that you have the courage to call this sadistic bullshit for what it is. -Charles Frederick
- Fuck, double post -CF
- "Something is perfect not when there is nothing else to add, but when there is nothing else to take away." While you were busy spouting off on things you know nothing about, I took the time to look up the actual quote. "A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -Antoine de Saint-Exupery A DESIGNER, Mr. Pants. Not a writer. Here. Try a quote that's actually relevant. "Politically correct speech does not enhance language; it dilutes it." - George Carlin That quote also has the added bonus of representing the correct half of this His-opinions-would-mean-more-if-he-didn't-swear "debate".
- Didn't he already draw a dead (murdered) woman with her pantied ass sticking up in the air? Clearly, this means that Terracciano is, in fact, becoming less creepy. Unless you think think that sexualizing an unconscious dying woman is more creepy than doing the same to a woman that is simply dead. But the fact that there can be comparisons like this made from examples within his body of work is still pretty fucking creepy. The comic I'm referring to is at http://www.dominic-deegan.com/view.php?date=2004-05-13 Yes, I read through the archives. I couldn't look away, it was like a train wreck.... don't look at me!
- I am utterly baffled. In frame one, we have a woman in rather poorly drawn pants. In frame four, we have ice as the bottom half of a woman. In what weird dimension do you see a panty shot? In short, TRY HARDER, DAMN YOUR MISBEGOTTEN DEPRAVED HIDE.
